SALEM
SALEM STUDY SYSTEM
Systems > ESF & Design

ESF & Design

⚠️ DRAFT

ESF & Design

Overview

Chapter 15 of the UFSAR presents the analysis of plant responses to postulated accidents and transients. Events are categorized into four conditions based on expected frequency and consequences. The analyses demonstrate that the plant design meets all applicable safety criteria. (UFSAR 15)

Event Classification

ConditionDescriptionExpected FrequencyConsequence LimitSource
INormal Operation and Operational TransientsFrequently occurringNo fuel damage; within normal operating limitsUFSAR 15.1
IIFaults of Moderate Frequency (AOOs)Once per year to once per plant lifetimeNo fuel rod failure; RCS pressure below 110% of designUFSAR 15.2
IIIInfrequent FaultsOnce per plant lifetime to once per 100 plantsSmall fraction of fuel failure; offsite doses within 10CFR50.67UFSAR 15.3
IVLimiting FaultsNot expected but postulatedDose consequences within 10CFR50.67 limitsUFSAR 15.4

Condition II Events (Faults of Moderate Frequency)

EventKey ProtectionSource
Uncontrolled RCCA Bank Withdrawal from SubcriticalPower range high flux trip (low setpoint), OT Delta-TUFSAR 15.2.1
Uncontrolled RCCA Bank Withdrawal at PowerOT Delta-T, OP Delta-T, high flux tripUFSAR 15.2.2
RCCA Misalignment (dropped rod)Automatic rod control response, power range negative flux rate (removed)UFSAR 15.2.3
Uncontrolled Boron DilutionSource range flux doubling (shutdown), OT Delta-T (at power)UFSAR 15.2.4
Partial Loss of Forced Reactor Coolant FlowLow flow trip (2/3 per loop)UFSAR 15.2.5
Startup of Inactive RCS LoopAdministrative prohibition in Modes 1-2UFSAR 15.2.6
Loss of External Electrical LoadHigh PZR pressure trip, steam dumpUFSAR 15.2.7
Loss of Normal FeedwaterLo-Lo SG level trip, AFW actuationUFSAR 15.2.8
Loss of Offsite PowerRCP coastdown, AFW on UV signal, diesel generatorsUFSAR 15.2.9
Excessive Heat Removal (FW malfunction)High flux trip, OT Delta-TUFSAR 15.2.10
Excessive Load IncreaseSelf-limiting with negative MTC; rod control responseUFSAR 15.2.11
CVCS Malfunction (boron dilution)Source range/OT Delta-T protectionUFSAR 15.2.12
Inadvertent ECCS ActuationPressurizer level/pressure control; operator actionUFSAR 15.2.14

Condition III Events (Infrequent Faults)

EventKey ProtectionSource
Loss of Reactor Coolant (Small Break LOCA)SI on low PZR pressure or high containment pressureUFSAR 15.3.1
Minor Secondary System Pipe BreakSI, steamline isolationUFSAR 15.3.2
Inadvertent Loading of a Fuel Assembly into an Improper PositionIn-core monitoring, startup physics testingUFSAR 15.3.3
Complete Loss of Forced Reactor Coolant FlowLow flow trip, RCP flywheel coastdownUFSAR 15.3.4
Single RCCA Withdrawal at Full PowerOT Delta-T, OP Delta-TUFSAR 15.3.6

Condition IV Events (Limiting Faults)

EventKey ProtectionSource
Major Rupture of RCS (Large Break LOCA)SI signal, ECCS injection (accumulators, SI pumps, RHR pumps)UFSAR 15.4.1
Major Secondary System Pipe Break (Steamline Break)SI on steamline signals, MSIV closure, AFWUFSAR 15.4.2
Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR)SI on low PZR pressure, operator identification and isolationUFSAR 15.4.3
Single Reactor Coolant Pump Locked RotorLow flow trip, RCP breaker tripUFSAR 15.4.4
Fuel Handling AccidentFuel building ventilation, HEPA/charcoal filtersUFSAR 15.4.5
Rupture of a Control Rod Drive Mechanism (Rod Ejection)High flux trip (high and low setpoints), OT Delta-TUFSAR 15.4.6

ATWS (Anticipated Transients Without Scram)

Analysis per 10CFR50.62 demonstrates that AMSAC (backup turbine trip and AFW actuation) prevents unacceptable consequences if the RPS fails to trip the reactor. Key mitigation: diverse AMSAC system trips turbine and starts AFW on low SG level independent of the RPS. (UFSAR 15.5)

Key Analysis Assumptions

  • Initial conditions: Nominal values with uncertainties applied per RTDP or STDP
  • Reactor trip: Credited trip functions from TS including instrument uncertainties and response time delays
  • Single failure: Most limiting single active failure assumed
  • Loss of offsite power: Assumed concurrent with LOCA unless shown not limiting
  • Decay heat: ANS-1979 decay heat model (UFSAR 15.1.8)
  • Rod insertion: RCCA insertion curve from physics testing, most reactive rod stuck out (UFSAR 15.1)

Dose Consequence Limits

CriterionLimitSource
Exclusion area boundary (2 hr)25 rem TEDE10CFR50.67
Low population zone (duration)25 rem TEDE10CFR50.67
Control room (30 days)5 rem TEDE10CFR50.67 / GDC-19

Tech Spec LCOs

Accident analyses provide the bases for many Tech Spec limits including:

Connections