TS 3/4.1.1 — Boration Control
Shutdown Margin — Tavg > 200°F
Applicability: Modes 1, 2*, 3, and 4
Action:
With the SHUTDOWN MARGIN less than 1.3% delta k/k, immediately initiate and continue boration at ≥ 33 gpm of a solution containing ≥ 6560 ppm boron or equivalent until the required SHUTDOWN MARGIN is restored.
Surveillance Requirements:
| SR | Requirement | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1.1.1.1.a | Determine SDM ≥ 1.3% delta k/k after inoperable rod detected. If rod is immovable or untrippable, increase required SDM by at least the withdrawn worth of that rod. | Within 1 hr, then every 12 hrs while inoperable |
| 4.1.1.1.1.b | Verify control banks within COLR limits (Mode 1, 2 with keff ≥ 1.0) | Per SFCP |
| 4.1.1.1.1.c | Verify predicted critical rod position within COLR limits (Mode 2, keff < 1.0) | Within 4 hrs prior to criticality |
| 4.1.1.1.1.d | Consider SDM factors with control banks at max insertion limit | Prior to initial >5% RTP after each fuel loading |
| 4.1.1.1.1.e | Consider: boron concentration, rod position, Tavg, fuel burnup, xenon, samarium | Per SFCP (Modes 3, 4) |
| 4.1.1.1.2 | Compare overall core reactivity balance to predicted values within ±1% delta k/k. Normalize predicted values prior to 60 EFPD after fuel loading. | Per SFCP |
*See Special Test Exception 3.10.1 | Amendment No. 282
▶ Bases — 3/4.1.1.1 Shutdown Margin (Tavg > 200°F)
A sufficient SHUTDOWN MARGIN ensures that: (1) the reactor can be made subcritical from all operating conditions, (2) reactivity transients from postulated accidents are controllable within acceptable limits, and (3) the reactor is maintained sufficiently subcritical to preclude inadvertent criticality in the shutdown condition.
SDM requirements vary throughout core life as a function of fuel depletion, RCS boron concentration, and Tavg. The most restrictive condition occurs at EOL, with Tavg at no-load operating temperature, associated with a postulated steam line break accident and resulting uncontrolled RCS cooldown. In the analysis of this accident, a minimum SHUTDOWN MARGIN of 1.3% Δk/k is initially required to control the reactivity transient. The requirement is consistent with FSAR safety analysis assumptions.
The ±1% Δk/k core reactivity balance limit is based on engineering judgment. A 1% deviation from predicted is larger than expected for normal operation and should be evaluated. Since deviations are normally detected by comparing predicted and measured steady state RCS critical boron concentrations, a 1% Δk/k difference would correspond to approximately 100 ppm boron concentration difference — well within the uncertainty limits for boron concentration sample analysis, so spurious violations are unlikely.
Core reactivity is verified by periodic comparisons of measured and predicted RCS boron concentrations, with other core conditions fixed or stable (control rod position, moderator temperature, fuel temperature, fuel depletion, xenon, and samarium concentration). The surveillance frequency is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program.
The predicted reactivity values shall be adjusted (normalized) to correspond to actual core conditions prior to exceeding a fuel burnup of 60 Effective Full Power Days after each fuel loading. This ensures the design predicted core reactivity has been benchmarked against actual core performance early in the cycle. 60 EFPD allows sufficient time for core conditions to reach steady state while preventing operation for a large fraction of the fuel cycle without a benchmark.
Shutdown Margin — Tavg ≤ 200°F
Applicability: Mode 5
Action:
With the SHUTDOWN MARGIN less than 1.0% delta k/k, immediately initiate and continue boration at ≥ 33 gpm of a solution containing ≥ 6560 ppm boron or equivalent until the required SHUTDOWN MARGIN is restored.
Amendment No. 282
▶ Bases — 3/4.1.1.2 Shutdown Margin (Tavg ≤ 200°F)
With Tavg ≤ 200°F, the reactivity transients resulting from a postulated steam line break cooldown are minimal, and a 1% Δk/k shutdown margin provides adequate protection. The lower SDM requirement reflects the reduced severity of reactivity excursions at cold conditions compared to the EOL condition that governs the 1.3% limit above 200°F.
Moderator Temperature Coefficient
Applicability:
- BOL Limit: Modes 1 and 2* only
- EOL Limit: Modes 1, 2, and 3 only
Actions:
| Condition | Required Action | Completion Time |
|---|---|---|
| MTC more positive than BOL limit in COLR | Establish and maintain control rod withdrawal limits sufficient to restore MTC. If not restored: | Within 24 hrs, or be in Hot Standby within 6 hrs |
| MTC more negative than EOL limit in COLR | Be in Hot Shutdown | Within 12 hrs |
Surveillance Requirements:
| SR | Requirement | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1.1.3.a | Measure MTC and compare to BOL limit in COLR | Prior to initial >5% RTP after each fuel loading |
| 4.1.1.3.b | Measure MTC at any power and compare to 300 ppm surveillance limit in COLR | Within 7 EFPD after reaching 300 ppm equilibrium boron |
If the 300 ppm comparison shows MTC more negative than the surveillance limit, remeasure and compare to EOL limit at least once per 14 EFPD for the remainder of the cycle.
*With keff ≥ 1.0 | See Special Test Exception 3.10.3 | Amendment No. 197
▶ Bases — 3/4.1.1.3 Moderator Temperature Coefficient
The limitations on MTC are provided to ensure that the value of this coefficient remains within the limiting condition assumed in the accident and transient analyses. The MTC values of this specification are applicable to a specific set of plant conditions; accordingly, verification of MTC values at conditions other than those explicitly stated will require extrapolation to those conditions in order to permit an accurate comparison.
The negative MTC value equivalent to the most positive moderator density coefficient (MDC) was obtained by incrementally correcting the MDC used in the FSAR analysis to normal operating conditions. These corrections involved: (1) converting the MDC to its equivalent MTC based on the rate of change of moderator density with temperature at RATED THERMAL POWER conditions, and (2) subtracting from this value the largest differences in MTC observed between EOL (all rods withdrawn) RATED THERMAL POWER conditions and the most adverse conditions of moderator temperature and pressure, rod insertion, axial power skewing, and xenon concentration that can occur in normal operation. These corrections transformed the MDC value used in the FSAR analysis into the limiting EOL MTC value.
The 300 ppm surveillance limit MTC value represents a conservative value at a core condition of 300 ppm equilibrium boron concentration that is obtained by correcting the limiting EOL MTC for burnup and boron concentration. The surveillance requirements for measurement of MTC at the beginning and near the end of the fuel cycle are adequate to confirm the MTC remains within its limits, since this coefficient changes slowly due principally to the reduction in RCS boron concentration associated with fuel burnup.
Minimum Temperature for Criticality
Applicability: Modes 1 and 2 (with keff ≥ 1.0)
Action:
With Tavg less than 541°F, restore Tavg within 15 minutes or be in Hot Standby within the next 15 minutes.
Surveillance Requirements:
| SR | Requirement | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1.1.4.a | Verify Tavg ≥ 541°F | Within 15 min prior to criticality |
| 4.1.1.4.b | Verify Tavg ≥ 541°F when critical and Tavg < 551°F with Tavg-Tref Deviation Alarm not reset | At least once per 30 min |
See Special Test Exception 3.10.3
▶ Bases — 3/4.1.1.4 Minimum Temperature for Criticality
The 541°F minimum ensures: (1) MTC is within its analyzed range, (2) protective instrumentation is within normal operating range, (3) P-12 interlock is above its setpoint, (4) pressurizer is capable of being OPERABLE with a steam bubble, and (5) reactor vessel is above its minimum RTNDT temperature.
View Tech Spec PDF | View Bases PDF
Connections
- Related systems: Rx Vessel & Internals, CVCS, RCS
- Related exam questions: 2018 Q91
- Related exam: 2018 NRC Written Exam